Marriage
“This
is now bone of my bones
and
flesh of my flesh;”
For
this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to
his wife
and
they will become one flesh. Genesis 2:23a, 24
In the Quest study Bible there is a margin note that says “Interpersonal chaos would result from unrestricted, random and casual pairings. The cohesiveness that the family unit offers society would dissolve. To provide a solid basis for the family, God set up this lifetime commitment and relationship between a man and a woman. God intended that the fullest and most satisfying expression of two becoming one flesh would be found in the marital covenant.”
I
am often accused of being narrow minded when it comes to marriage. I
hear a lot of “not everyone has to be married.” True, I would not
argue with that. Marriage is not for everyone. However, that does not
mean that it is okay to enter into a pseudo marriage. That logic
covers someone who chooses to remain single. It is not the argument
to use to defend a situation where a man and a woman live as if they
were married but just don't “bother” with the formality of
getting married.
The
other argument of course, is for same sex couples. Due to the fact
that I am a strong supporter of marriage, I hear that I am “not
fair” to homosexuals. First of all, to same sex couples and to
heterosexual couples who just choose to live together may I say, not
for the first time..... I agree with
the rule. I honor the
rule. I, however, did not make the
rule.
Second,
to the same sex proponents I would add, I was vehement about this
long before that debate started. Years ago, when one of my own dear
ones chose to move in with his girlfriend I became a bit unglued.
It's just not right.
Does
this make me narrow minded? Yes. But as I point out to that
challenge, it's a narrow path. The Bible is the Truth. Again, I
didn't write one word, one letter, in it but I love it, agree with it
and try to honor it.
Reread
the words from the Quest margin. “The cohesiveness of the family
unit would dissolve.” Can you really disagree with that in 2016
America? If you can you haven't been in a school lately. There is a
whole new vocabulary. Step-parents, baby mama, baby daddy, my dad's
girlfriend, my mom's wife etc. etc. And who suffers the fallout? The
children. Then again, not only the children but they are the
innocents in the picture.
True
commitment is a thing of the past in far too many ways. In that
sense, I would say, God bless the same sex couples who at least want
to say in some tangible way, “I'm choosing you.” It's preferable
to “You're okay for now, but let's not get too crazy.” Or too
comfortable or too secure. If the adults in a relationship aren't
secure, aren't protected by a covenant made before God and man, then
where will the children involved find their security?
Let
me make sure to say this is not an indictment of any individual or
group of people. Grace is not mine to dispense or withhold. As God
floods my life with grace, I am called to be gracious to others. This
is not about any person or people group. This is about agenda, the
agenda that says traditional marriage is an antiquated concept. It is
not! It is an ageless institution mandated by God, not by a
government or a group of fanatics.
Family
first is a slogan we see all the time and while circumstances like
death or the unavoidable divorce can alter how that looks, the makeup
of the basis of a family, one man, one woman, married to each other
is not a choice. Chaos is resulting. It is our responsibility
to pray that it stops.
Comments
Post a Comment